Amendments to the Administration of Justice (Protection) Act clarify penalties for those who abuse court processes for financial or strategic gain.
Singapore’s Ministry of Law (MinLaw) has clarified that individuals who abuse court processes by filing groundless or frivolous claims with the intent to oppress others or extort settlements would be committing contempt of court. This move follows the passing of amendments to the Administration of Justice (Protection) Act (AOJPA) in Parliament on November 13, 2024, aimed at combating “lawfare”—the abuse of legal processes to delay or pressure parties.
MinLaw stated that while individuals have the right to represent themselves in court, simplified processes are available, the new amendments provide safeguards against individuals using the system to file meritless claims intended to harass defendants. Such claims can be struck out if deemed frivolous, and costs can be awarded against the party filing them.
The law also introduces penalties for those obstructing or interfering with the administration of justice. These reforms were highlighted as essential by Minister of State for Law Murali Pillai, who emphasized the importance of preserving trust in Singapore’s judicial system.
The amendments came in response to concerns about the increasing abuse of court processes, as exemplified by a defamation lawsuit involving Associate Professor Ben Leong of the National University of Singapore (NUS). In an online post, Prof. Leong shared his concerns about facing a defamation suit that could lead to significant legal costs, even if he wins the case. MinLaw did not provide specific comments on this ongoing case but stated that it would monitor developments and consider further reforms if necessary.
Under the new regulations, individuals found guilty of contempt of court for filing unmeritorious claims could face fines or jail sentences. For contempt during proceedings in the State Courts, penalties include a fine of up to $20,000 or up to a year of imprisonment. In more serious cases in the High Court or Court of Appeal, offenders may face fines up to $100,000 and up to three years in prison.
